#43011: Trade routes should not yield 0
Open Date: 2021-10-09 22:36
Last Update: 2022-02-04 22:00
URL for this Ticket:
https://osdn.net//projects/freeciv/ticket/43011
RSS feed for this Ticket:
https://osdn.net/ticket/ticket_rss.php?group_id=12505&tid=43011
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Changes/Comment on this Ticket:
2022-02-04 22:00 Updated by: cazfi
Comment:
Even route with 0 trade (e.g. after city size has shrunk) has the benefit of keeping the route alive, for the time when the trade increases. Making 1 the minimum trade would mean that there's no benefit of developing the city (or even the route -> distance) to level where it would really deserve that 1 trade. This can be significant in a low-trade ruleset.
Overall, I don't think either making 1 the minimum trade or keeping the current behavior is correct for all situations / rulesets. Should we make it a ruleset setting?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ticket Status:
Reporter: ddeanbrown
Owner: (None)
Type: Feature Requests
Status: Open
Priority: 5 - Medium
MileStone: (None)
Component: (None)
Severity: 5 - Medium
Resolution: None
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ticket details:
Because of round down, a trade route can give 0 trade, should have minimum of 1.
--
Ticket information of Freeciv project
Freeciv Project is hosted on OSDN
Project URL: https://osdn.net/projects/freeciv/
OSDN: https://osdn.net
URL for this Ticket:
https://osdn.net/projects/freeciv/ticket/43011
RSS feed for this Ticket:
https://osdn.net/ticket/ticket_rss.php?group_id=12505&tid=43011