OSDN -- Desarrollar y descargar software de código abierto
Translation Status of Español translation status for es

Foros: Forum of Decimal BASIC (Thread #642614)
Return to Thread list RSS

BasicAcc faster than ParactBasic (2023-08-02 07:55 by Marcominero #689044)

I have Lenovo 7i with Windows 10
The following program (100 millions of random numbers):
LET tt =TIME
LET n = 100000000
FOR i = 1 TO n
LET x = RND
NEXT i
PRINT TIME - tt
END
Takes 2.32" in BasicAcc and 4.26" in ParactBasic
Why?

Responder al #689044×

You can not use Wiki syntax
You are not logged in. To discriminate your posts from the rest, you need to pick a nickname. (The uniqueness of nickname is not reserved. It is possible that someone else could use the exactly same nickname. If you want assurance of your identity, you are recommended to login before posting.) Entrar

Re: BasicAcc faster than ParactBasic (2023-08-02 08:27 by SHIRAISHI Kazuo #689056)

Paract BASIC takes more time than BASICAcc.
This is the reason why BASICAcc is published separate from Paract BASIC.
Responder al #689044

Responder al #689056×

You can not use Wiki syntax
You are not logged in. To discriminate your posts from the rest, you need to pick a nickname. (The uniqueness of nickname is not reserved. It is possible that someone else could use the exactly same nickname. If you want assurance of your identity, you are recommended to login before posting.) Entrar

Re: BasicAcc faster than ParactBasic (2023-08-02 08:28 by SHIRAISHI Kazuo #689057)

Paract BASIC takes more time than BASICAcc.
This is the reason why BASICAcc is published separate from Paract BASIC.
Responder al #689044

Responder al #689057×

You can not use Wiki syntax
You are not logged in. To discriminate your posts from the rest, you need to pick a nickname. (The uniqueness of nickname is not reserved. It is possible that someone else could use the exactly same nickname. If you want assurance of your identity, you are recommended to login before posting.) Entrar