Language definition for CM_RE missing

• Informador: efq
• Propietario: (Ninguno)
• Tipo: Feature Requests
• Estado: Open
• Componente: (Ninguno)
• Hito: (Ninguno)
• Prioridad: 3
• Gravedad: 5 - Medium
• Resolución: Remind
• Fichero: Ninguno

Details Responder

Language definition for CM_RE is missing in files:

File 1: XOOPS_ROOT_PATH/language/english/comment.php
Missing: define('_CM_RE','Re');

File 2: XOOPS_ROOT_PATH/language/japanese/comment.php
Missing: define('_CM_RE','...........');
(Unfortunately my Japanese is not so good)

Solution: add missing definitions

Cheers

Ticket History (3/5 Histories)

2007-04-25 15:40 Updated by: minahito

• Propietario Update from (Ninguno) to tom_g3x
• Prioridad Update from 5 - Medium to 3
• (Grupo change on Tracker)
• (Categoría change on Tracker)
• Resolución Update from Ninguno to Accepted

Comentario Responder

Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

Thank you for reporting.

Because _CM_RE constant has been defined in xoops.org after
"fork", Legacy doesn't have this constant. We should define
this, too.

2007-04-25 18:44 Updated by: minahito

Comentario Responder

Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

However,

Basically Legacy doesn't support the spec of xoops.org
edition which has been defined after "fork". The reason is
that we can not decide Legacy's spec between JP edition and
XOOPS.org edition.

The software has to have the clear goal. Legacy's goal is
XOOPS 2.0.16 JP compatible.

Legacy's goal is XOOPS 2.0.16 JP compatible. So remember
that even if Legacy doesn't support new specs of xoops.org
edition, that's not bug.

2007-04-25 19:03 Updated by: efq

Comentario Responder

Logged In: YES
user_id=28554

Thank you for your response, so it is not a bug then. If
this language definition is not added to the core I think I
might just add a preload class in order to be compatible
with some XOOPS modules that use this language definition
in their comments functionality.

2007-04-27 12:38 Updated by: minahito

• Propietario Update from tom_g3x to (Ninguno)
• Resolución Update from Accepted to Remind

Comentario Responder

Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

Sorry, we decided that Legacy 2.1 doesn't add compatibility
with xoops.org's spec after "fork", to uniform Legacy's
spec. We have to define "The Standard" of Legacy "2.1".

We will complete 2.1 on this standard, once. After that,
let's discuss what we should do. Cube is full-plugin
(full-exchangable) features. So we can test different types.

2007-04-29 20:01 Updated by: minahito

• (Grupo change on Tracker)
• (Categoría change on Tracker)

Comentario Responder

Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

Moved to "Feature Requests" once.