Issue submission guidelines - the 4 fields list
Indeed, thanks. The "Milestone" reference, in that list, is bogus; only project administrators should have the authority to establish milestones. I've removed the bogus reference, in addition to correcting a couple of obsolete references to "SF users", (which should, of course, refer instead to "OSDN.net users").
BTW, this ticket was assigned to "earnie", who is not active at the present time. I'm guessing that you didn't assign that, but rather it was an automatic consequence of your (entirely appropriate) identification of "WEBSITE" as the "Component" association? Since assignment to inactive users may lead to delay, in processing of tickets, I've also disabled all such automatic "owner" assignments.
The following is copy-pasted from the issue submission form guidelines above:
What looks weird is that first you say "four fields" and then you list 5. Maybe, say, the last one should be removed from here?